Two lines on the same certificate. Only one of them is insurance.
A certificate holder receives a snapshot of your policy. An additional insured is covered by it. Those are completely different things, and being listed in the certificate holder box gives the other party no rights under your policy at all. Additional insured status exists only when an endorsement has actually been added to the policy — the certificate reports that fact, it never creates it.
CG 20 10 alone does not cover completed operations.Every ACORD 25 Certificate of Liability Insurance carries a disclaimer across the top. It is not fine print anyone slipped in — it is part of the standard form, and it says exactly what the document is:
“THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.”
And, further down: “If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed.”
The form tells you in capital letters that it is not insurance. It is a status report on a policy that exists somewhere else. If the policy changes tomorrow, the certificate does not update itself, and the certificate holder is not entitled to be told.
North Carolina puts the same rule in statute. Under N.C.G.S. § 58-3-149, “a certificate of insurance is not a policy of insurance and does not amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the policy to which the certificate of insurance makes reference.” The statute makes it unlawful to knowingly prepare, issue, request, or require a certificate that contains false or misleading information about the policy, that purports to alter the coverage, or that includes information not contained in the underlying policy. A person not otherwise regulated under Chapter 58 who violates it faces a civil penalty of up to $5,000.
That statute is why your agent will not simply type the sentence your general contractor asked for onto the certificate. It is not stubbornness. Adding wording that the policy does not support is a violation, and it would not help you anyway — a court reads the policy, not the certificate.
An additional insured endorsement changes the policy. It extends your liability coverage to another party for liability connected to your work. Practically, that means when the general contractor gets named in a suit arising out of your crew's work, your carrier defends them and pays on their behalf, inside your limits.
Two consequences follow, and business owners are regularly surprised by both:
“Name us as additional insured” is not a specification. The ISO forms that do it differ from one another in ways that decide claims. These are the four you will meet most often on a construction contract:
| Form | Title ends with… | What it actually does |
|---|---|---|
CG 20 10 | … Scheduled Person Or Organization | Names a specific party. Covers liability caused in whole or in part by your acts or omissions in the performance of your ongoing operations. Once your work is finished, it stops. |
CG 20 37 | … Completed Operations | The other half. Covers the named party for liability arising out of your completed work — the claims that show up a year or three after the job closed out. |
CG 20 33 | … Automatic Status When Required In Construction Agreement With You | Blanket, so nobody has to be scheduled by name. But it has been read to reach only parties you contracted with directly, and it covers ongoing operations only. |
CG 20 38 | … Automatic Status For Other Parties When Required In Written Construction Agreement | Written to close the gap in CG 20 33. Picks up the upstream parties — typically the project owner — that your GC’s contract requires you to cover even though you never signed anything with them. |
Here is the trap that costs the most money. A contract says “name us as additional insured for ongoing and completed operations,” the sub's policy carries CG 20 10, and everyone signs off. Two years after the job is done a homeowner sues over the work. CG 20 10 covers ongoing operations. The work is not ongoing. The general contractor is not an additional insured for that claim, and finds out during the tender.
Covering both requires both forms, or a blanket endorsement written to include completed operations. When your contract asks for both, we check which editions are actually attached to your policy rather than assuming.
ISO revised these endorsements in the 04 13 editions, and the revisions narrowed them. Two changes matter to you:
The second one cuts both ways and it is worth understanding before you negotiate. If your contract demands $2,000,000 and you carry $1,000,000, the endorsement does not manufacture the second million — you are in breach of the contract, not covered for it. If the contract demands $1,000,000 and you carry $2,000,000, the additional insured gets $1,000,000, not your full limit.
There is also an older distinction that still turns up, because policies renew with whatever edition the carrier files. The 1985 edition of CG 20 10 used “arising out of your work” — broad language that swept in completed operations. Editions from 2004 forward use “caused, in whole or in part, by” your acts or omissions, which requires a causal link to your conduct. If someone hands you a contract written against a 1985 form, the coverage available in the market today is narrower than what the contract assumes.
Both Carolinas restrict how far a construction contract can push liability downhill, and both carve insurance out of the restriction.
North Carolina, N.C.G.S. § 22B-1 voids a provision in a construction contract that requires you to indemnify another party against liability for bodily injury or property damage proximately caused by the negligence of that party. But subsection (e) says the section “shall not affect an insurance contract, workers' compensation, or any other agreement issued by an insurer.”
South Carolina, S.C. Code § 32-2-10 makes a promise to indemnify another party against liability arising from that party's sole negligence unenforceable as against public policy — and states that the section “shall not affect any insurance contract or workers' compensation agreements.”
The practical upshot: an indemnity clause and an additional insured requirement are two separate mechanisms, and knocking out the first does not knock out the second. That is precisely why sophisticated general contractors ask for both. It is also why the endorsement request in your contract deserves as much attention as the hold-harmless paragraph you were told to sign, and often more.
We do this reading for clients as part of the account, not as a separate engagement. It is the single highest-value thing an agent does for a contractor, and it happens before the loss rather than after.
This page explains how these endorsements and contract terms generally work. It is not a coverage opinion. What your policy actually covers is decided by the policy language, the endorsement editions actually attached, and the contract you signed — all of which we are happy to read. Send us the requirements or call (704) 461-3020.